Tipping Points of Emotional Intelligence
The tipping point with most things often relates to a threshold of something that has accumulated to a point of maximum effectiveness and at the point of diminishing returns or ineffectiveness. The four pillars of Emotional Intelligence; Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, and Social Skills, in conjunction with cognitive competencies, provide data contributing to the efficacy or the limiting determinants that make sufficient effectiveness in performance (Boyatzis, 2006, p. 125). Petrides (2017) stated, "McClellan and his students showed that there tend to be 'tipping points' in the relationship between emotional competencies and performance" (p.4).
Understanding and managing one's own emotional intelligence and being able to offer empathy and compassion in the right way at the right time under the right circumstances can lead to outstanding performance. Mind you, the term 'right' is in relation to what it is you are trying to accomplish. Lacking understanding and, or management of one's own emotional intelligence, or not applying empathy and compassion to a social situation when needed for outstanding leadership can render one's performance less than outstanding. Managing your social skills with Positive and Negative Emotional Attractors (PEA/NEA), helps a leader either "...trigger constructive and physiological responses that enhances an individual's motivation, effort, optimism, flexibiity, creative thinking, resilience and other adaptive behaviors," or calls "attention to current social and environmental stressors that may compromise an individual's effectiveness" (Howard, 2006, p. 657).
In 2019, I led a reconnaissance team of five Special Operators into a training scenario that would ultimately teach me that leading others effectively required a good working knowledge of my subordinates' emotional state, as well as a sense of their personalities. It was not long into our patrol that I gave our Leading Petty Officer (LPO) the opportunity to take charge and navigate the team to the Lay-up Point (LP) through the dark in the middle of the woods. My LPO was eager to lead and perhaps a bit over-confident. I realized 30 minutes into the patrol that the LPO was taking us in the wrong direction. I knew I needed to replace him without him losing the respect of his men. When I asked the men to 'circle up,' I made it clear that the upcoming terrain should be getting easier and that I would need my most experienced navigator in the rear of the patrol in case we encountered a threat and needed to depart the area. I asked for a volunteer to become the lead navigator. Out of the three that raised their hand, I chose the one I thought would be most competent. I thanked my LPO in front of the rest of the guys for getting us as far as he did safely. My LPO walked back to the trail position of the patrol, looking like he was being punished.
The decision I made left my LPO feeling insecure about looking incompetent to navigate despite my attempt to make him look good in front of his peers. I did not understand how my LPO perceived the situation, and I did not manage his emotional disposition well afterward. In hindsight, it would have made more sense to halt the patrol and quietly speak with him to help him navigate the terrain in the dark. Doing so would have looked like I was getting an update from him and passing vital information to him. If I had done this instead, we would have eventually made it to the LP, keeping his peers' respect and his dignity.
The other Petty Officer I chose to take the lead felt inspired by the vote of confidence I lent him in choosing him to navigate over the other two volunteers. His successful navigation to the LP built up his confidence and showed his peers competence to lead the team. I also took the time to thank him in front of his peers for doing a great job navigating the team in the dark for the first time.
In both situations, I had triggered PEAs as well as NEAs. The conditions I exercised my decisions in were more complex than I was aware of and therefore did not appropriately prepare and manage all the decisions I had made that day. Being aware of such potential attractors while considering all the courses of action to take can help mitigate the risk of reaching a tipping point rendering performance less than outstanding.
References:
Boyatzis, R. E. (2006). Using tipping points of emotional intelligence and cognitive competencies to predict financial performance of leaders. Psicothema. Retrieved from http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3287.pdf